Одну секунду
Что-то сучилось. Попробуйте еще раз.
How wikipedia смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на .
This video talks about how the world's largest encyclopedia came to be and how it operates differently than most other popular websites. To submit ideas and vote on future topics: 🤍 Patreon: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 A very special thanks to this wonderful group of Patrons: Amy Westacott, Angus Clydesdale, Brandon L, Brett Walton, Chris Lion-Transler, Christian & Penny Gray, Dominique Dugas, Dustin Van Horn, Dylan Kinnard, Emerald Computers – Jason Dragon, Fortunate Calf, Jesse Long, Jimmy1985, Jon, Julianne Beach, Logan Brown, Marshall Kurtz, Meow Wolf, Michelle Chisholm, Mike Weaver, milkshake, My NameIsKir, Nicholas Murphy, Peter Wesselius, Rob, Robert T Kirton, Sam Bennett, Sirpoptart, Sondre Grimsmo Sinnes, Stewart Tritapoe, Super Duper Paratrooper, Taylor LaBrier, Tristan Williams, Victor Anne, Vincent Frame. Company Declines: Kmart: 🤍 Blockbuster: 🤍 RadioShack: 🤍 Solo Cups: 🤍 Toys "R" Us: 🤍 hhgregg: 🤍 Pan Am: 🤍 ESPN: 🤍 Gibson: 🤍 iHeartMedia: 🤍 Bon-Ton: 🤍 Kodak: 🤍 General Electric: 🤍 Woolworth: 🤍 Dell: 🤍 Sears: 🤍 Payless: 🤍 Hostess: 🤍 Redbox: 🤍 Nokia: 🤍 JCPenney: 🤍 Quiznos: 🤍 GameStop: 🤍 NASCAR: 🤍 Shopko: 🤍 MoviePass: 🤍 Reebok: 🤍 The Gap: 🤍 Pier 1 Imports: 🤍 Sbarro: 🤍 AOL: 🤍 Long John Silver's: 🤍 Chuck E. Cheese's: 🤍 GNC: 🤍 Website created by - 🤍 Intro Made By - 🤍
Is Wikipedia a reliable source, or is it as prone to bias and false information as any other media outlet? In this video, we explore the fundamental problems of modern Wikipedia, and discover how the website regularly lies to its readers. One of the most basic lies Wikipedia tells is that it has a neutrality policy - in reality, the policy has glaring flaws. It's frequently used to assert liberal left worldviews as fact, as if they were the neutral statements of truth. On issues including (but not limited to) race and crime, drug legalization, and even religion, Wikipedia presents unbalanced and in some cases outright misleading information. The website has gotten to the point that its own co-founder, Larry Sanger, even wrote an article verbally destroying it. The article, titled 'Wikipedia Is Badly Biased' will be linked below. Other sources, including the many different studies documenting Wikipedia's left wing bias, are also linked. Follow me on other platforms! Telegram - 🤍 Bitchute - 🤍 Odysee - 🤍 Gab - 🤍 Citations: Wikipedia Is Badly Biased by Larry Sanger - 🤍 Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia - 🤍 Ideology and Composition Among an Online Crowd: Evidence from Wikipedians - 🤍 Wikipedia Source Analysis - 🤍 Differential rates of disciplinary action reveals evidence of political bias in Wikipedia's arbitration enforcement - 🤍 Music used in this video (in chronological order): Serenity - Prod. Riddiman Journey to Rome Part I - Jeff Van Dyck Autumn - Jeff Van Dyck Rome HQ - Jeff Van Dyck
Free Civic Online Reasoning lessons, assessments and videos are available at 🤍 You might have heard that you can’t trust anything on Wikipedia. If that’s the case, then why do professional fact checkers often use it? In this video, we break down the basics of how to use Wikipedia wisely. Based on research with professional fact checkers, the Civic Online Reasoning curriculum from the Stanford History Education Group provides resources to help students become better consumers of digital information.
Wikipedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages, all written by online volunteers. Errol Barnett talks to one editor who was named among Time Magazine’s most influential people on the internet. Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on iOS HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on Android HERE: 🤍 Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: 🤍 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! 🤍 Delivered by Norah O’Donnell, Gayle King, John Dickerson, and Bianna Golodryga, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
How does Wikipedia contribute to free knowledge? On January 15, 2016 Wikipedia turns 15 years old! Old (or maybe young?) enough to become the largest collection of free and collaborative knowledge in human history! Learn how YOU can contribute to the movement and become a part of the amazing community here: 🤍 Authors: Herve Pierre Louis, Ilya Kompasov, Roman Ilyushenko
Learn how to create your own Wikipedia page, step-by-step, from start to finish! We'll cover everything you need to know to make a Wikipedia page on your PC or Mac. #Wikipedia Steps: 1. Go to 🤍wikipedia.org in your web browser and click on the language version that you want to use. 2. In the upper-right corner, click Log In. 3. Click in the box labelled “Enter your user name” and type in your user name. Then click on the box labelled “Enter your password” and type in your password (it will appear as bullet points to protect it from prying eyes). Finally, click the Log In button. 4. You will notice that the menu in the top-right corner has changed. Click on Sandbox. 5. Your “Sandbox” is your personal editing space, where you can practice how to create and edit pages, and even submit new pages to Wikipedia once they’re done. The top toolbar gives you some quick formatting options, such as bolding or italicizing your font, inserting a hyperlink or image, or using other common formatting conventions (such as lists or tables). The bottom toolbar lets you add special characters, including codes that have various effects on Wikipedia. The middle of the page is your main window, where you’ll start typing to bring your article to life! 6. If you’re still totally lost, type 🤍 into your web browser to get an easy example of how to create a Wikipedia article. 7. When you’re done, you can click Show Preview to see what your article will actually look like once it’s up on Wikipedia. If you like what you see, you can click Save Page. 8. If you’re satisfied and want to try to make your page available for everyone who visits Wikipedia to see, click Submit Your Draft for Review. Then click Save Page again when you get to the next screen. You’ll probably get plenty of feedback from the community on things that are good or can be improved. Don’t be discouraged if your article doesn’t pass the first time; just take the feedback you get into consideration and try again, or ask for help on a “talk” page. Either way, you’ve taken your first step towards contributing to a global archive of shared knowledge!
Why Wikipedia Works Really Well in Practice, Just Not in Theory Watch the newest video from Big Think: 🤍 Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos: 🤍 Harvard University's Jonathan Zittrain explores the amazing success of Wikipedia, a concept that "works really well in practice, just not in theory." Not only is it a remarkable and unique model of a self-regulating entity, but also its governors and stakeholders are both members of the public at large. Zittrain examines whether Wikipedia is something that can be sustained long-term, whether it will need to adapt or grow in the future, and whether such adaptations and growth could potentially scuttle the entire operation. Finally, Zittrain offers up a suggestion for how to apply Wikipedia in an academic setting: Why not turn Wikipedia articles into long-term research projects? JONATHAN ZITTRAIN: Jonathan Zittrain is a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, Professor of Computer Science at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vice Dean for Library and Information Resources for the Harvard Law School Library, and Co-Founder of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Previously, he was the Chair in Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University and a principal of the Oxford Internet Institute. He was also a visiting professor at the New York University School of Law and Stanford Law School. Zittrain’s research interests include battles for control of digital property and content, cryptography, electronic privacy, the roles of intermediaries within Internet architecture, and the useful and unobtrusive deployment of technology in education. He is also the author of The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It, as well as co-editor of the books, Access Denied (MIT Press, 2008), Access Controlled (MIT Press, 2010), and Access Contested (MIT Press, 2011). TRANSCRIPT: Jonathan Zittrain: There's a great saying that Wikipedia works really well in practice, just not in theory. And that is true. Wikipedia's success is so singular, so spectacular that figuring out whether it's a model for anything other than Wikipedia is a puzzle that even the folks behind Wikipedia have faced as they've tried to do Wikisearch, Wikinews, and Wiktionary at different times. But the idea of having a scheme where the day-to-day governance, the day-to-day edits, whether done for substance to improve the truth level of an article in the view of the editor or done for process, oh that edit shouldn't have been made; it breaks the following rule; I'm going to revert it. To have the people doing that be members of the public at large is an extraordinary devolution of responsibility out to people who are in one way or another, implicitly or explicitly sort of taking an oath to subscribe to the principles behind Wikipedia of neutrality, of fairness, of learning — kind of the values of the enlightenment. And can that survive itself over the long haul? I don't know. As you get more and more importance attached to Wikipedia, more and more places that draw from Wikipedia as a source of data, whether it's something like the Wolfram Alpha Knowledge engine or Google to assemble basic facts for results in a search. There may be more and more reason for entities to want to game the results. If you can just put yourself in the Guinness Book of World Records for having the longest beard or something and you don't actually have to grow anything, it's like well why not? I'll vote myself rich. These are problems that Wikipedia has had to deal with so far relatively successfully. And there's a level of humility that I think it has to maintain in order to recognize new problems, to recognize where there might the structural forms of bias or discrimination going on. And to be able to endure the more targeted intentional attempts to basically poison the well of truth that Wikipedia at least aspires to be. What would I propose as a longer-term way of shoring it up? I think we should solve a problem with a problem. We haven't really figured out in the early 21st century what to do with kids who are in school for hours at a time every day sort of warehoused in daycare; I think it would be wonderful to make as part of the curriculum from, say,... To read the transcript, please go to 🤍
This video is about Wikipedia Editors Patreon: patreon.com/ghostgum Twitter: twitter.com/notghostgum Shoutout to Squiff for the Art: 🤍 Outro Song: I'm just chillin - Seggito #wikipedia #mods
i refuse to say 'gynoid' content warning: sexual assault, violence, self-harm Wonderful background art by Skutch: 🤍 Contact: Twitter: 🤍 Patreon: 🤍 Twitch: 🤍 ape escape
This is a short video about how the online information repository Wikipedia came into being. NOTE: This video is intended to be a very simple overview of the Wikipedia project. With that said, the video does gloss over Larry Sanger's contributions to Wikipedia, and it oversimplifies his reasons for leaving the project. As pointed out by Larry Sanger himself, Mr. Sanger did approve of, and support Wikipedia as a free, open source, online encyclopedia; however, he was critical of "certain aspects of the Wikipedia project." More information on Larry Sanger's role in Wikipedia's development, and his criticism of the model, can be found here: 🤍 More interesting stuff at: 🤍. ...or follow 🤍SurviveEnglish on Twitter
Guys, if you wanna learn how to make videos, i have officially opened up the Nas Academy! It's an ONLINE school where we teach you how to script, shoot ,and edit videos...LIVE! Nas Academy has very limited spots, so sign up now - That's 1 minute, see you tomorrow. 🤍
💡 If you’ve been on Wikipedia at any point in the last few months, you'd see those alarming ads asking for your donations. It seems like they're strugglingly financially. But, does Wikipedia really need your money that badly? What's the truth? Where is Wikipedia spending your donations? #finance #economics #accounting #startups 🔖 This video essay was inspired by: HaDewey, Caitlin. “Wikipedia Has a Ton of Money. So Why Is It Begging You to Donate Yours?” The Washington Post, WP Company, 28 Apr. 2019 🎵 Music / Footages used in video: Onion Capers by Kevin MacLeod; Link: 🤍 License: 🤍 ✌️ Subscribe to our channel here 🤍 — 👉 Follow Marg!ns: Facebook: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍marginsyoutube Tiktok (new): 🤍marginsyoutube Twitter: Coming Soon — About Marg!ns: Margins (stylized as Marg!ns) is an up-and-coming educational channel about how behavioral economics plays a role in businesses. The channel's namesake, "margins", is an important buzzword in finance, accounting and economics. Our goal is to inspire and empower entrepreneurs and startups. — About the creator: Just a 20-something CPA sharing what he loves, and he wants the world to feel the love too!
A look at whether the Soviet Famine of 1932-33 was an intentional, planned genocide of Ukrainians, & Wikipedia's presentation of that question. Support me on Patreon: 🤍 Twitch stream: 🤍 Follow my Instagram: 🤍 Become a member on YouTube: 🤍 One-time donations: 🤍 Second Channel: 🤍 00:00 Intro 00:45 On Wikipedia 08:48 The Holodomor Genocide Question 01:24:00 Conclusion Sources: [1] Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Edward S. Herman & Noam Chomsky. [2] 🤍 [3] Why wasn't genocide a crime in Australia?, Shirley Scott. [4] Towards a Decentred History: The Study of the Holodomor and Ukrainian Historiography, Olga Andriewsky. [5] Stalin and the Soviet Famine of 1932–33 Revisited, Michael Ellman. [6] 🤍 [7] Lemkin on the Ukrainian Genocide, Roman Serbyn. [8] Bloodlands, Timothy Snyder. [9] Genocide in International Law, William A. Schabas. [10] Totally Unofficial Man: The Autobiography of Raphael Lemkin, Raphael Lemkin. [11] 🤍 [12] Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, Stephen Kotkin. [13] 🤍 [14] The Years of Hunger, Robert Davies & Steven Wheatcroft. [15] The Harvest of Sorrow, Robert Conquest. [16] The Turn Away From Economic Explanations for Soviet Famines, Stephen Wheatcroft. [17] The Complexity of the Kazakh Famine: Food Problems and Faulty Perceptions, Stephen Wheatcroft. [18] Soviet Man-Made Famine in Ukraine, James E. Mace. [19] The Left Side of History: The Embattled Pasts of Communism in the Twentieth Century, Ronald Grigor Suny. [20] Famines, Amartya Sen. [21] The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933, Mark B. Tauger. [22] Natural Disaster and Human Action in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1933, Mark B. Tauger. [23] The Indian Famine Crises of World War II, Mark B. Tauger. [24] Red Holocaust, Steven Rosefielde. [25] 🤍 [26] In Search of a Soviet Holocaust, Jeff Coplon.
Wat de hoofdstad van Lesotho is, wanneer het paleolithicum begon of hoeveel awards Ariana Grande op haar naam heeft staan. Wikipedia heeft de antwoorden. We kunnen inmiddels niet meer zonder de website die 21 jaar geleden in het leven werd geroepen. Maar hoe kan het eigenlijk dat we al die gratis info zomaar tot ons kunnen nemen? En hoe objectief is het platform? In deze video nemen we je mee in de wondere wereld van Wikipedia. We danken Sandra Rientjes, directeur Wikimedia Nederland, voor haar informatie en tegenlezen van het script. Wikipedianen Michelle Boon-Van Dijk en Stella van Ginkel voor hun input en Emiel Rijshouwer die ons meer kon vertellen over zijn onderzoek naar Wikipedia. Zie hier een link naar zijn proefschrift: 🤍 Muziek oa van: - Kanye West - Real Friends instrumental - Sofi Tukker type beat (instrumental) - Tropicano - Wicked Game (Luxury Remix) - Ituana - Chris Isaak - Wicked Game (Gemma Hayes Remix) Meer video’s? Abonneer, zet je belletje aan 🔔 en praat mee! 🤍 Volg ons ook op Instagram: 🤍 VRAGEN/TIPS/IDEEËN? We horen graag wat jij van het nieuws en onze uitleg vindt, laat je horen in de comments! Of mail ons: nosop3🤍nos.nl De NOS is de grootste nieuwsorganisatie van Nederland. Bij NOS op 3 vind je elke zaterdag nieuws dat je niet mag hebben gemist. Wij gaan voor jou op onderzoek uit naar nieuws uit jouw wereld. Ook vind je hier uitleg bij het nieuws.
The Rise of Wiki. How does Wikipedia make money? How does Wikipedia work? How does Wikipedia editing work? How does Wikipedia get information? Can Wikipedia be trusted? Who are Ward Cunningham, Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales? What is a Wiki? We discuss how a wiki of just 21 articles spawned one of the world's top ten most visited websites. In this video, we look at The Rise of Wikipedia, the world's biggest and best encyclopedia with over fifty million pages, and how a free website without advertising generates millions of dollars every year. Here's How It Happened 0:00 Introduction 0:33 The First Wiki 1:12 Wikipedia's Predecessor: Nupedia 1:46 The Rise of Wikipedia 2:34 How Wikipedia Makes Money 3:11 Criticisms of Wikipedia 4:04 Final Thoughts Our Favorite Laptop: 🤍 💻 Noise-Cancelling Headphones: 🤍 🎧 Studio Quality Mic: 🤍 🎙 ► FTC Legal Disclaimer - Some links found in the description box of our videos may be affiliate links, meaning we may receive a small commission on sales you make through the link. This is at no extra cost to you to use our links/codes; it's just one more way to support us and our channel! :) #Wikipedia #TheFreeEncyclopedia #HowItHappened
Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales, founder of Wikipedia created the world's biggest encyclopedia in 2001. It is owned and operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, which run various initiative such as Wikipedia ZERO. Jimbo explains how Wikipedia works - entirely run by volunteers who are passionate about the subject area they write on and if its not accurate then let them know... they will rectify it because they want Wikipedia to be as accurate and reliable as possible.
Subscribe and you'll have good luck forever :) Check out my other socials! 🙌🏼 Instagram ► 🤍 TikTok ► 🤍 Twitch ► 🤍 Twitter ► 🤍 IF YOU WANT TO WATCH MY ONE OF MY LONG VIDEOS: 🤍 #shorts #wikipedia #speedrun #sambucha
Even with public trust at an all-time low, Wikipedia continues to maintain people's confidence. How do they do it? Former CEO of Wikimedia Foundation Katherine Maher delves into the transparent, adaptable and community-building ways the online encyclopedia brings free and reliable information to the public while also accounting for bias and difference of opinion. "The seeds of our disagreement can actually become the roots of our common purpose," she says. If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: 🤍 Follow TED! Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 LinkedIn: 🤍 TikTok: 🤍 The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit 🤍 to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more. Watch more: 🤍 🤍 TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy (🤍 For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at 🤍 #TED #TEDTalks
اگر شما مثل من در دنیای اینترنت زندگی میکنید پس حتما میدانید ویکی پدیا چیست. ویکی پدیا به گفته الکسا، جزو ده وبسایت برتر دنیا محسوب میشود که همه چیز در آن مجانی است. از یادگیری علم گرفته تا نشر دادن آن و هر کسی، از من گرفته تا شما، میتوانیم متنهای ویکی پدیا را ویرایش کرده و یا حتی متنهای جدید به آن اضافه کنیم. ولی مثل هر وبسایت یا کمپانی بزرگی، یک شکست بزرگ در گذشته تاریک آن وجود دارد. در این ویدیو قرار است ابتدا داستان نابودی برادر کوچکتر ویکی پدیا، نوپیدیا را تعریف کنم و سپس از خود ویکی پدیا براتون بگم. پس با دیجیاتو همراه باشید. 📢 آدرس سایت و شبکه های اجتماعی ما 📡 🌍 WEBSITE 🔵 🤍 🤳 INSTAGRAM 🔵 🤍 🚀 TELEGRAM 🔵 🤍 🐤 TWITTER 🔵 🤍 #digiato #wikipedia #nupedia #encyclopedia
This explainer video shows the different user roles within Wikipedia and answers the question if your edit will be published immediately.
Who can edit and contribute to Wikipedia? And what are semi-protected articles? We explain the different user roles in Wikipedia and how Wikipedia protects its knowledge. This video was produced in cooperation with Wikimedia Germany. Authors: Elisabeth Mandl Denis Schröder Ilya Kompasov Theresa Sieder
Wikipedia is making us all dumb and lazy. SUBSCRIBE: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: 🇨🇦Support me on Patreon! 🤍 🤖Join my Discord! 🤍 🇺🇸Follow me on Instagram! 🤍 🇨🇦Read my latest Washington Post columns: 🤍 🇨🇦Visit my Canada Website 🤍 Some music by: Craig Henderson- 🤍 ComradeF- 🤍 HASHTAGS: #wikipedia #rant #videoessay
In an age of misinformation, these “Wikipedians” are the heroes the internet needs.... Subscribe now for more Elite Daily videos: 🤍 Producer: Manuel Lavalle Director of Photograpy: Kevin Losani Editor: Manuel Lavalle Senior Motion Graphics: Oliver Dudman Senior Producer: Kevin Losani Post Production Supervisor: Evan D. Newman Executive Producer, Elite Daily: Tyler Gildin Music Courtesy of Extreme Music: "Sex Lies And Duct Tape" Written by Billie Ray Fingers Andrew Brick Johnson Bruce Fingers "Brick By Brick" Written by Billie Ray Fingers Jacob Shea Jared Michael Fry Bruce Fingers "Saving Daylight" Written by Patrizio Knight Adam Jan Janota-Bzowski Website: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 G+: 🤍 Elite Daily Video captures the spirit of our generation through cinematic storytelling. This includes in-depth documentaries, emotional social experiments, entertaining social commentary, and original scripted series. For all video inquiries contact: VideoContact 🤍 elitedaily.com 🤍
We've all been told that Wikipedia isn't a good source for research, but how can it have such high quality information and yet still be susceptible to user vandalism? Naturally, the answer involves robots. Whoopsy by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (🤍 Artist: 🤍
📈 Hire Pre-Vettted SEO Experts 🤍 This is a step by step tutorial on how to make a WikiPedia page. Anyone can create a WikiPedia page, and hopefully after watching this tutorial you’ll be able to do it. 👉 Time stamps: 0:00 Intro 0:10 Wikipedia is competitive 0:41 The requirements 1:04 Step 1 : Sign up 1:23 Wikipedia visual editor 1:33 Wikipedia sandbox 2:23 Citations 3:39 Reference lists 3:57 Internal links 4:22 External links 4:46 Publishing your page 5:17 From sandbox to main space 5:28 Requirements for main space 5:42 Live example 6:28 Asking a Wikipedia editor 7:28 Outsourcing to Vettted ✍️ Written guide on How to make a WikiPedia page: 1. Go to wikipedia.org and select the WikiPedia for your desired country. In this video I chose 🤍 2. In the upper-right corner, click “create an account”. Put in all the relevant info such as your username and password. 3. Verify your email and login into your new account. 4. Click on “preferences”, then “editing", and then select "Show me both editor tabs" on the "Editing mode" dropdown menu. 5. Click on "sandbox" in the upper-right corner. This is where you'll be able to make your Wikipedia page. You will be able to write your WikiPedia page in full detail. The first thing you should do is create a heading for your page title. I recommend you use the 'visual editor' since it's more user friendly. The toolbar on top gives you all the tools you need to format your page. You can add citations, references, lists, tables, special characters, internal and external links, and various other effects. This toolbar gives you all the tools to make your Wikipedia page come to life! If you still need help, just go to this link: 🤍 It will teach you and guide you in full detail on how to create your first Wikipedia article. 6. After you written your page, it's time to publish it. You can do this by clicking on the "publish page..." button. This will post your wikipedia page on the sandbox. Which you can then move to the main space. 7. To move your Wikipedia page to the main space you need to meet two requirements. The first one is that you need to have at least a 4-day old account. The second requirement is that you need to have made at least 10 edits with your Wikipedia account. 8. After the page is moved from the sandbox to the main space, you will most likely get plenty of feedback from Wikipedia's community on what can be improved on your page. Your Wikipedia page will most likely not stick on the first try, but don't get discouraged. Just take all the feedback into consideration and try again. 9. If you want to outsource all of this work to a WikiPedia expert, you can do so on Vettted.com You can learn how to create a link from Wikipedia by watching this video: 🤍
Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger. Listen to the podcast version: 🤍 Read the full article here: 🤍 Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopaedia’s influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions. But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”. This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopaedia’s commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”. Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 #wikipedia #covid19 #bias
WATCH ME LIVE ► 🤍 follow me on twitter ► 🤍 follow me on tiktok ► 🤍 follow me on instagram ► 🤍 join my subreddit ► 🤍 LINK TO EVERYTHING ► 🤍 edited by: 🤍 #ludwig #speedrun #wikipedia
No, you can't get a Wikipedia page. My advice: if you're not a celebrity or big business it will get taken down. Don't waste your time. ►Subscribe: 🤍 Learn more on our blog: 🤍 Ignite Visibility is a premier Internet marketing company based in San Diego, CA. #digitalmarketing #internetmarketing #YouTube #shorts
hey guys I hope you enjoy this video Add yourself on Wikipedia: 🤍 please like share and subscribe to my channel! 💙💚💜💛🧡❤
From creating a new account, using your Sandbox, and making your first edits to a Wikipedia article.
I love bees This clip is made by: 🤍 Main Channel: 🤍 2nd Channel: 🤍 DougDoug Clips TikTok: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Twitch: 🤍 LinkedIn: 🤍 This is an unofficial DougDoug clips channel. #DougDoug #stream #clips #twitch
Wikipedia is no doubt one of the most useful resources as a student as it basically has articles on everything you can think of from history and literature to calculus and physics. Despite this, most teachers and professors aren't very big fans of Wikipedia given that the site has historically not been the most accurate or reputable because anyone can submit revisions and additions to the site. Over time, the site has become much more accurate due to the large number of contributors, and in most cases, all of the sources used for the wiki article are cited. So, Wikipedia is often a great starting point to get a general understanding of a topic or concept which can then be confirmed by cross-referencing the sources. But, this still leaves the question: Who founded Wikipedia and where are the founders today? This video explains the story of Larry Sanger, Jimmy Wales, and Wikipedia, and how they created one of the most resourceful sites in the world. Discord Community: 🤍 Timestamps: 0:00 - Wikipedia 0:59 - Jimmy Wales 3:45 - Larry Sanger 6:00 - Nupedia 8:10 - Wikipedia 10:16 - Jimmy & Larry Today Thumbnail Credits: Rex 🤍 🤍 Resources: 🤍
#WhatisWikipedia? #Education #career What is Wikipedia with Full Information? – [Hindi] – Quick Support. क्या हमें विकिपीडिया के बारे में कुछ ऐसी इंफॉर्मेशंस शेयर नहीं कर लेनी चाहिए जो वाकई इंफॉर्मेटिव हो और दुनिया की सारी चीज़ों के बारे में नॉलेज देने वाले विकिपीडिया के बारे में भी आपको कुछ एक्स्ट्रा नॉलेज मिल जाये। तो इसी बात पर आज विकिपीडिया के बारे में ही इंटरेस्टिंग नॉलेज ले लेते हैं इस वीडियो के जरिये. इसीलिए इस विडियो को पूरा जरुर देखिये. Website: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 Youtube: 🤍 Linkedin: 🤍 Channel Owner: Anil Nakrani
This explainer video shows what working on Wikipedia looks like and that it is more of a social network then working on your computer alone.
I love Wikipedia! I even donated to it. But I won't donate again, now that I've learned how BIASED Wikipedia has become. ———— To make sure you see the new weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: 🤍 ———— No right-leaning outlets, Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… is considered “reliable” by Wikipedia. None. But even some of the most extreme leftist outlets get a "reliable" badge like “Jacobin," a self-described SOCIALIST outlet. Vox, Buzzfeed News, and Slate are also deemed “reliable” by Wikipedia. Editors may base stories on their reporting. Why did Wikipedia become so biased? Veteran Wikipedian Jonathan Weiss tells me that the site, like academia, has been captured by leftists. Some Wikipedia administrators even brag on their profiles, "this user is a socialist." Another put up images idolizing communist murderers Che Guevara and Vladimir Lenin. These administrators make final decisions about what counts as “reliable," and what goes on Wikipedia. That’s why for years, Wiki's "communism" page made NO mention of the millions killed by that ideology. US border facilities are listed under "concentration camps,” on the same page as Wikipedia’s holocaust facilities. Can we fix this? Wikipedia is supposed to be a site that "anyone can edit," so I made an edit. You can find out what happened in the video above.
WATCH ME LIVE ► 🤍 follow me on twitter ►🤍 follow me on instagram ► 🤍 join my subreddit ► 🤍 Stanz, Atrioc and I go at another round of Wikipedia speedruns. This time I show you what it truly means to be the world record wikipedia speedrunning GOAT. edited by: 🤍 #ludwig #speedrun #wikipedia
.svg){kind=small}
![Meet The People Who Devote Their Time To Editing Wikipedia [INSIGHTS]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-453OSDO3yU/mqdefault.jpg "Meet The People Who Devote Their Time To Editing Wikipedia [INSIGHTS]")
![What is Wikipedia with Full Information? – [Hindi] – Quick Support](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eqEpNNH92j8/mqdefault.jpg "What is Wikipedia with Full Information? – [Hindi] – Quick Support")
